3. BenningtonÕs First Days of Settlement
The early
settlers of Bennington suffered great inconvenience for want of roads and
bridges, and also for the want of mills.
To overcome these difficulties the proprietors and inhabitants taxed
themselves liberally both in money and labor. Roads were opened to the different parts of the town and
bridges built where necessary.
Samuel
Robinson and Joseph Safford built "the Safford Mills" in the east
part of the town by the first of September 1762. These were a sawmill and gristmill, for which they received
a bounty of $40 for each mill, the bounty having been previously promised by
vote of the proprietors. A bounty
of $40 was also given for erecting a sawmill "on the west side of the
town."
On December
2, 1762, a church was organized, which by vote on the same day adopted the
Cambridge platform, with the exception of such parts of it as admitted the aid
of the civil magistrates in enforcing the support of the ministry, and their
coercive power over the church in other matters. They called themselves Congregationalists, and were such in
every respect except in regard to their enlightened notions of religious
freedom, which being at the time in advance of the great majority of their
brethren, procured for them the temporary name of "Separatists."
In the fall
of 1763, the Rev. Jedediah Dewey of Westfield, Mass., in consequence of a call
from the church and society of Bennington, moved to this town and became their
pastor. In addition to the
encouragement given him by voluntary subscription, the proprietors of the town
voted him "the minister's right," which was situated adjoining
"the town plat" and was valuable. Mr. Dewey continued as pastor of the church until his death,
Dec. 21, 1778.
The
settlement of Pownal, under the New Hampshire charter, was commenced in the
spring of 1762, there being at that time four or five Dutch families within the
limits of the township claiming under the "Hoosick patent" granted by
the government of New York. This
patent was alleged to include a portion of the westerly part of the township. Among the early settlers of the town
were the families of Wright, Gardner, Morgan, Dunham, Card, Noble, Curtis,
Watson, and Seelye, though the precise date of their several emigrations to the
town has not been determined.
Shaftsbury
was settled in 1763 — by Messrs. Cole, Willoughby, Clark, Doolittle,
Waldo, and several families of Mattesons. The families of Carpenter, Buck, Bates, Olin, Cross,
Draper, Huntington, and Spencer were also early settlers, though not among the
emigrants of the first year.
In Arlington
the first settlement was made in 1763 by Doctor Simon Burton, William Searles,
and Ebenezer Wallis. The next year
Jehiel Hawley, Josiah Hawley, Remember Baker, and Thomas Peck moved into town;
it was subsequently, during the Revolutionary war, the residence of Thomas
Chittenden, Ethan and Ira Allen and others distinguished in the annals of
Vermont.
Sunderland
was first settled in 1765, by Messrs. Brownsons, Bradley, Warren, Everets,
Chipman, and Webb, emigrants from Connecticut.
The
settlement of Manchester was begun in 1764 — by Samuel Rose and others
from Dutchess County, New York.
Among the first settlers were the families of Marsh, French, and Mead,
and the families of Purdy, Ormsby, Soper, Weller, Powell, Roberts, Whelpley,
and Smith, also came to the town early.
The first
settlement of Dorset was made in 1768 — by Felix Powell from
Massachusetts, Isaac Lacey from Connecticut, and Benjamin Baldwin, Abraham
Underhill, John Manly, and George Gage from New York. Rupert was settled about the same period. Landgrove by William Utley in 1769;
Peru in 1773; Sandgate and Stamford before the Revolution, and the other towns
in the county at later dates.
In addition
to the difficulties and dangers naturally attending the transformation of a
wilderness into a cultivated country, which had been in some measure foreseen,
the settlers of this county were soon called upon to encounter other
difficulties which were of so serious and trying a character as to exert an
important influence on the progress of the settlements, and on the civil
institutions which were formed within the newly acquired territory.
The lands of
the settlers had been granted by charters issued in the name of the King of
Great Britain, purporting to be by his authority, and evidenced by the
signature and seal of the governor of New Hampshire, one of His Majesty's royal
provinces; and the farms which they occupied had been fairly purchased and paid
for. It was the doctrine of that
day that the ungranted lands of the country belonged to the Crown; and as the
lands in question were universally believed to be within the province of New
Hampshire, it had not occurred to the purchasers that any question could arise
in regard to their titles.
Such question was made, however, and the controversy it produced was of a novel and interesting character.
About Us | Village | Photos | Resources | Conservation | Stories | News | Site Map