7. A Confusion of Jurisdictions
The
jurisdiction of New York was never fully submitted to by the towns west of the
Green Mountains, the inhabitants being governed by committees and by officers
appointed and regulations made in their town meetings. In Bennington, the ancient warnings of
town meetings, which are recorded on the town books, were signed by the
selectmen, and directed to the constable, who gave personal notice to the
inhabitants. Up to the year 1770, these warnings are all headed "Province
of New Hampshire, ss," &c. showing that the people still claimed to be
under that province.
From 1770
until the establishment of the Constitution of Vermont in 1778, the warnings
were simply dated at Bennington, indicating that they deemed themselves
independent of all authority but their own. It is probable that the records of other towns will show a
similar state of things.
The
organization of counties, which has been described, continued so long as the
government of New York exercised any jurisdiction over any part of the
territory of Vermont.
The progress
of New York in her efforts to obtain possession of the disputed lands underwent
some interruption from the order in council of July 1767. It was, however, soon discovered that
the order in its terms only forbade the making of new grants, but
did not prohibit the taking possession of such as had already been issued by
that province. In October 1769 the
Governor's Council advised him that the King's order "Did not extend to
prevent the governor from the granting of any lands which had not previously
been granted by New Hampshire."
The governor
therefore proceeded to issue new grants, and in practice wholly disregarded the
King's orders, granting to his favorites and friends, as well those lands that
were covered by New Hampshire charters, as well as those of which no grant had
been made.
The mission,
therefore, of Samuel Robinson to England, though attended with much apparent
success, had no other effect upon the New York government than to impose a
temporary check upon its operations.
It inspired the settlers, however, with new confidence in the justice of
their cause, and gave them strong ground to hope that their rights would be
eventually acknowledged and protected by the "home government," which
was then recognized as the supreme authority that must finally determine the
controversy.
In
1769, the efforts of the New York claimants to obtain possession of the
disputed lands were again commenced with new vigor. In October of that year, several inhabitants of Bennington
were assembled on the farm of James Breakenridge in the western part of the town,
assisting him in harvesting his corn.
While they were thus employed, a number of men with surveying
instruments came upon the farm and appeared to be running a line across
it. Breakenridge, with
Samuel Robinson (afterwards known as Colonel Samuel Robinson) left their work
and entered into conversation with them.
The intruders declared they were acting under the authority of New York,
and were surveying and dividing among the proprietors the patent of Wallumschaik. (The orthography of this name is given
in the text as it is found in all of the New York records. It was pronounced Walloomskoik, or by
abbreviation, Loomskoik. It is a
genuine Dutch name, and the original pronunciation is still preserved by our
old men, though by some sort of legerdemain it has come to be written
Walloomsack. This modernization of
the name makes it neither Dutch, Yankee nor Indian, and ought to be abandoned.)
Breakenridge
and Robinson forbade their proceeding further, stating at the same time that
they did not design to threaten them, but merely to protest against the act for
the purpose of preserving their legal rights. Much conversation took place, and finally the party desisted
from their survey and retired. It
seems probable it was the intention of Breakenridge and his friends to prevent
the survey, and that force might have been used by some of them had force been
found necessary. They doubtless
desired, if possible, to keep within the pale of the law.
Force was
not used, but the party retired, and Abraham Ten Brook, one of the proprietors
of the patent, petitioned the Governor and Council of New York on the subject,
stating that the commissioners and surveyors for dividing the patent of
Wallumschaik had been "riotously opposed by sundry persons, and prevented
by their threats from executing the trusts reposed in them."
A
proclamation was then issued by the Governor "for apprehending and
securing the principals and ringleaders." And at the following January term of the Albany courts,
several persons who were present were indicted as rioters. Among those indicted were the Rev.
Jedediah Dewey, Joseph Robinson, Elijah Fay, Thomas Henderson, Ebenezer
Robinson, and John Stewart. These
facts have been ascertained from records and papers on file at Albany, and are given
as specimens of the occurrences of that day. None of the persons indicted was arrested or brought to
trial.
There were
other attempts of a similar character, which were generally attended with the
like results. Actions of ejectment
were also brought against the settlers by the New York grantees. To rid themselves of these annoyances,
and to secure their property from future seizure, the settlers still sought the
protection of the parent government.
To strengthen their interest in England, they petitioned the Governor
and Council of New Hampshire to interpose with the Crown in their behalf.
In a
petition to the governor of New Hampshire, signed by about four hundred of the
settlers on the west side of the mountain, dated October 13, 1769, (a copy of
which is in the possession of the writer) it is stated that they were molested
by several writs of ejectment in various townships, and threatened with many
more, and that the grantees under New York, "were running out the lands in
the possession of the petitioners," as they declared, by order of the
government of New York. Similar
facts are also set forth in another petition to the governor of New Hampshire,
dated October 24, 1769, signed by Samuel Safford, agent for Bennington;
Benjamin Gardner, agent for Pownal; Jehiel Hawley, agent for Arlington;
Benjamin Purdy, agent for Manchester; Thomas Barney, agent for Sunderland; and
Benjamin Colvin, agent for Shaftsbury.
About Us | Village | Photos | Resources | Conservation | Stories | News | Site Map